No Palm Trees Here…

If you’re looking for thrills to combine with a conference in perfect peace, you may not have to travel far to get blown away with the experience of a lifetime in the middle of the Atlantic—on riveting team building events in the Faroe Islands.

Crazy helicopter rides among stunningly towering islands or boat rides along a shoreline of high-rising cliffs and fairy grottoes. Jump! Into the water, scuba diving with hundreds if not thousands of birds over your head and even more fish down below in the deep—or take the off-road vehicle up the mountain side to experience a wildlife that is unlikely to be more than thirty minutes away from your hotel.

Read more at FaroeBusinessReport.com ...

Rain-Swept Paradise

There are quite a number of things that make the Faroe Islands a very special place—the islands’ compact nature provides an informality of the kind rarely seen elsewhere, and it means things can be fixed with remarkable ease.

By Quentin Bates

It’s an undiscovered but rather damp gem in the middle of the Atlantic that few people notice on their way past. It’s not to everyone’s taste, but the Faroe Islands are truly one of the pleasantest places in the world. As both a business traveller and an occasional tourist, there are few places I’d rather go.

The trouble is, the Faroes aren’t all that easily reached. My first visit was thirty years ago as a practically penniless backpacker heading back to a job in Iceland after a few weeks of hitchhiking around Denmark and Norway. I arrived on board the old Smyril ferry from Bergen, where I had cashed a cheque that subsequently bounced and worried the bank manager back home in England for months. As the ferry back then ran a circular route between Bergen, Tórshavn, Seyðisfjörður and Hirtshals, taking in a dogleg detour to Lerwick, I found myself with three days and practically no cash to spend admiring the turf roofs of Tórshavn bathed in July sunshine.

Read more at FaroeBusinessReport.com ...

Aberdeen Trade Show Highlights Crucial Role of Oil and Gas in World Energy Supply

SPE Offshore Europe brings more than 32,000 attendants from around the globe to North East Scotland for an update on the latest trends in what remains by far the world’s most important source of energy.

The 2011 edition of the biennial conference and exhibition SPE Offshore Europe saw a record 32,025 unique attendants check in at the Aberdeen Exhibition and Conference Centre during the 6th through 8th September event.

“SPE Offshore Europe was a great platform to discuss major issues, to spend quality time talking about where we are going and what the future will be,” said the event’s chairman, Samir Brikho, who is also the CEO of Amec, one of the world’s leading engineering, project management and consultancy companies.

In a statement from the event’s organizers — SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers) and Reed Exhibitions — Mr. Brikho added: “Understandably in a complex global industry there are still many uncertainties but the fundamentals of the business are here to stay. Based on what we debated and discussed in the conference sessions, it is very clear that if we want to manage supply and demand, there is no room for complacency. We need to be much more down to earth in our thinking when considering what will be the best solutions and to continue to put safety at the top of our priorities.”

So what was the big news this time around? Apart from the unveiling by UK Energy Minister Charles Hendry of the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Advisory Group’s (OSPRAG) 40-tonne well capping device on the first day of the event, more than 1,500 exhibitors covered an area that exceeded 25,000 square meters — again breaking previous records.

Whereas, fortunately, the actual need for “a vital piece of equipment with the capability to cap an uncontrolled subsea well” has not materialized in the UK to date, the oil and gas industry is clearly keen to demonstrate that it takes safety and environmental issues very seriously. Indeed, even the hypothetical threat of a disaster akin to that of the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico last year continues to cast a long shadow over drilling activities on both sides of the Atlantic.


‘Investing more than ever’: In the conference department, business breakfasts, topical lunches, and seminars drew oil and gas professionals and people from supporting industries to a number of presentations and discussions offered by the likes of Mr. Hendry and Mr. Brikho as well as other leaders, including Oil & Gas UK CEO Malcolm Webb, Schlumberger Chairman Andrew Gould, Shell Projects and Technology Director Matthias Bichsel, Wood Group PSN CEO Bob Keiller, TAQA Brattani CEO Leo Koot, Statoil Executive Vice President Peter Mellbye, BP North Sea Regional President Trevor Garlick, and Ernst & Young Global Oil & Gas Leader Dale Njoka, to name some.

The gist of what was said? Reports of the demise of oil and gas are highly exaggerated although they have been around for a hundred years. The thing is, significant oil and gas discoveries coupled with improved hydrocarbon recovery — all aided by new technologies — should be sending a sobering message to the world. In theory, this could help balance out some of the bias against oil and gas that seems to have influenced public policies in many countries.

The point was made that oil and gas is known as the world’s most technologically advanced industry, and that this industry is expected to retain its strength and vitality in the years and decades ahead.

Likewise, as was duly noted, oil and gas remains by far the most important source of energy and is likely to remain so for a long time, regardless of the drive toward renewable energy sources.

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s International Energy Outlook 2011, the world’s energy consumption will continue to predominantly consist of liquids, natural gas, and coal. From 2006 through 2035, depending on the price variable and the state of the world economy, most projections offered in the Energy Outlook predict the total consumption of petroleum and other liquid fuels to increase from about 85 million barrels per day to between 100 and 115 million barrels per day.

Meanwhile, according to Mr. Njoka, global investments in oil and gas over the coming years are expected to total some 33 trillion USD.

To cut it short, the world needs deliverable energy.

For Aberdeen, the offshore capital of Europe, the oil and gas industry remains the lifeblood of the economy throughout the region.

With the North Sea still valued as a viable business for many, BP and Shell have committed to invest 4.8 billion USD in the redevelopment of the Schiehallion and Loyal oil fields west of Shetland.

Referring to BP’s oil and gas operations in the North Sea, Mr. Garlick told Aberdeen’s Business Bulletin: “We are doing more than we have ever done, we are hiring more people than we have ever hired and investing more money than we have ever spent, although we are spending it in a more focused way.”

London Conference Sees Return to Sound Money as Inevitable in the Face of Currency Collapse

Experts from around the world predict the collapse of the international currency system — with gold and silver increasingly looking set to reclaim their historic role as money.

A conference held by the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA) in London 4th to 6th August saw nearly 400 people from 38 countries gather to hear presentations from world-leading experts on precious metals and financial affairs, many of whom maintained that the world is headed for an unprecedented collapse in the currency system.

In addition to GATA board members — chairman and founder Bill Murphy, secretary and treasurer Chris Powell, Adrian Douglas, and Ed Steer — conference panelists and speakers included, amongst others: Jim Sinclair, world-famous gold trader, Chairman of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration, and founder of the MineSet; Hugo Salinas-Price, founder, Director and Honorary President of Grupo Elektra, and founder and President of the Mexican Civic Association Pro Silver; James Turk, founder and chairman of GoldMoney, editor of the Free Gold Money Report and author of The Collapse of the Dollar; James G. Rickards, Senior Managing Director of Tangent Capital Partners and Senior Managing Director for Market Intelligence at Omnis; Eric Sprott, Chairman, CEO and founder of Sprott Asset Management; and Ben Davies, co-founder and CEO of Hinde Capital.

GoldMoney founder James Turk delivering
his presentation at GATA Gold Rush 2011.

The essence of what was said at GATA Gold Rush 2011 can be boiled down to the following: Expect the price of gold and silver to rise dramatically as the debasement of the world’s currencies picks up pace — therefore everyone should own precious metals to protect against a tsunami of inflation that can be expected in the near future as money printing goes into hyperdrive.

It was likewise alluded that with the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency and the monetary policies employed by the U.S. and most other countries set to continue on a path of self-destruction, there seems to be no policy change in the cards to avert calamity.

GATA has gained growing recognition for its tireless work to expose a shady price suppression scheme in the gold and silver markets orchestrated by a cartel of bullion banks, some large international banks and other major entities in the financial markets, with financial authorities and central banks turning a blind eye if not actively participating. The scheme has succeeded in keeping gold and silver underpriced for more than a decade by surreptitious manipulation of the markets through trading activities designed to create a grossly inflated impression of the supply of gold and silver.

As was pointed out by several presenters during the GATA conference at the Savoy Hotel in London, the price suppression scheme now appears to be falling apart due to the unexpected level of demand for physical metal from buyers around the world.


Silver Dollar for the Americans: Meanwhile, with no link to hard assets in place to put the brakes on currency expansion in the world of monetary policy, recklessness has accelerated since the closing of the gold window in 1971. With political leaders unable to curb unbridled deficit spending in such a corrupt environment, insurmountable sovereign debt has been allowed to accumulate for decades, eventually to the point of triggering fear and alarm in the markets.

“There was much interest at the conference in comments made by geopolitical analyst James G. Rickards about the possibility of something approaching martial law being declared in the United States and confiscation by the U.S. government of gold and silver,” Mr. Powell correctly noted shortly after the conference.

“Rickards’ comments confirmed GATA's correspondence with the U.S. Treasury Department in 2005 about invocation of the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977.”

That correspondence referred to can be found here.

Earlier this year in the U.S., Utah became the first of a number of states to clear the way for the use of gold and silver as ordinary means of payment by eliminating fiscal barriers.

According to some precious metals analysts, the question now is not if but when growing pressure from the state level will induce federal lawmakers to discontinue the capital gains tax that currently makes it practically impossible for the Americans to use gold and silver as money.

“Why not re-monetize the silver dollar?” asked Mr. Salinas-Price at the GATA conference in London, suggesting a similar solution as the one he is advocating in Mexico: gradually introducing sound money by allowing silver coins to be used alongside the existing paper currency. Whilst ultimately paving the way for the gold standard, he argued, such a move would mitigate the pain that must accompany the transition to sound money.

Mr. Salinas-Price said: “This program would return the silver dollar and its subsidiary silver coinage of half-dollars, quarters and dimes to the American people in such a way as never to disappear again: all rises in the price of silver would be matched with rises in the quoted monetary value of the silver dollar and by derivation, of its subsidiary coinage: the silver half-dollar, the quarter and the dime.

“This program would not cost the Federal Government — or the taxpayers that support it — one single cent! And yet, it would constitute the greatest gift to the American people that any US Congress could possibly invent, next only in importance to the return of the Gold Standard. The restoration of the silver currency of the United States to circulation, in parallel with the fiat FRN [Federal Reserve Note], can be considered the prelude to the revived Gold Standard.

“By paying the Treasury a premium of 15% over the bullion price of silver, the American people would actually be subsidizing the Treasury’s work of monetization. This cost would be a one-time cost of obtaining real money of permanent value and utility, independent of the Fed and the banking system.”

Silver Coin from South of Border Could Outdo Greenback in the US

Political leaders in Mexico are considering to monetize silver in an effort to prepare for the worst.

Having experienced the devastating consequences of a monetary meltdown not very long ago, the Mexicans are all too aware of the ills of economic disaster associated with runaway inflation caused by excessive money printing — only this time they might be the first to counter that very real threat.

While the world is watching the US-led global economy with growing concern over uncontrollable government spending, mounting sovereign debt crises, and unlimited money supply — raising the specter of hyperinflation for the dollar and in turn every other currency of today, as discussed in Mike Maloney’s movie Why Gold & Silver? — Mexico is contemplating its own way of cushioning the coming crash: monetizing a silver coin.

The idea, pushed for many years by businessman Hugo Salinas Price, is gaining traction among political leaders in Mexico, according to Mr. Salinas Price himself, who was interviewed by King World News on 18 May.

Meanwhile in a separate development, consistent with the new economic climate, the Bank of Mexico has purchased as much as 100 tonnes of gold to consolidate its finances. By becoming a net buyer of precious metals, Mexico is joining the growing ranks of central banks and governments around the world who have stopped selling their gold and are now hoarding it instead.

This shift seems to represent a break with the metal-dumping practices whose origins can be traced back to President Nixon’s 1971 abandonment of the gold standard to fund the enormous expenses of the Vietnam War with money printed out of thin air.

According to the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA) such practices have long been exercised by central banks and their affiliates to surreptitiously manipulate the gold and silver markets in order to create the impression that fiat currencies are as good as precious metals — a scheme that is nonetheless seen to be falling apart with the growing value of gold and silver in spite of the ongoing price suppression.

Mexico’s lead: Recognizing the severity of a spiraling crisis is one thing; taking corrective action, another. With the economy more globally interdependent than ever before in history, the transition from a worldwide system of fiat money based solely on governments’ perceived ability to honor their financial obligations, to sound money based on the value of gold and silver may prove difficult to implement without severe consequences.

The trouble is, said GoldMoney founder James Turk in a 12 May interview with King World News, a correction is inevitable and will come about either through urgent action by choice, if taken now, or by no-alternative reaction to a full-blown monetary crisis, if further put off.

Back in Mexico, Mr. Salinas Price would not want to challenge the political system by proposing metal backing for the Mexican peso at this point.

He told SilverSeek.com on 19 May that his campaign for silver does not involve a proposal to back the peso with metal. “I am not proposing anything so radical as a general reform of the Mexican monetary system,” he said, “simply because such a program would cause so much disruption and grief while people adapted to it, that it is politically impossible; and so it is useless to spend time working on something so ‘far out’.

“What I propose is simply to give a quoted monetary value to a one-ounce pure silver coin which already exists, the ‘Libertad’ ounce. This coin has no engraved value upon it, and it would be given a quoted monetary value by the Central Bank; the quoted monetary value would always be slightly higher than the market price of a silver ounce, and when the price of silver rises, the Central Bank is to adapt to that situation by giving the coin a higher price. When the price of silver falls, the last quote remains in place, so that the quoted value can never diminish, only rise to accommodate the higher market price of silver.

“By this means, something very important would happen: the silver coin would remain permanently in circulation with paper money; the silver coin would never be melted down, because higher prices of silver would simply mean a higher monetary value for the coin. Of course, people would save these coins, the demand for them would be enormous. But they could also use these coins for payments in emergencies or for investments. An excellent and simple way to save!

“There is in the world today, no real alternative to fiat money — fake money. All currencies of the world are equally void of any intrinsic worth. Monetizing the ‘Libertad’ ounce would give Mexicans an alternative and simple way of saving, in money that is truly money, because it is made of silver. Savings in ‘Libertad’ ounces would provide every family with a nest-egg of great importance, as it would consist of coins which cannot be devalued by the State, with a totally liquid value.”

With regard to the future and gold, Mr. Salinas Price said: “Talk of a return to gold is important, as it fosters a re-orientation of thinking which is indispensable — from the paper of the last 40 years, to gold, that will give more long-lasting benefits to humanity. Eventually, we’ll have to get past the ‘talking’ stage and move on to action; however, no one has a clue, at this point, on how to get from paper to gold!

“Monetizing the silver ‘Libertad’ coin is a first step in the right direction. It does not fix everything, it does not reform everything, it is painless and it is very, very attractive to people.”

Eitt sterkt gjaldoyra við sterti

Týðiligari viðurkenning av fiskivinnuligari søgu hevði kunnað gjørt kjakið um tilfeingisgjald og uppboð meira sakligt.

Eitt er hvat man meinar um hvørt tað almenna skal selja fiskirættindi fyri hægstbjóðandi ella ikki. Eitt annað, hvussu tann búskaparliga støðan er í teimum ymisku pørtunum av fiskiflotanum, og hví og hvussu. Fyrr enn hesi viðurskifti eru sannførandi greinað, er tað ringt at síggja motivatiónina fyri at innføra broytingar ið fiskivinnan sum heild ikki tykist taka undir við. Serliga tá ein páfallandi stórur partur av forsprákarunum fyri somu broytingum tykjast lítið og einki atknýti at hava til fiskivinnuna; spurningurin um neyðugt innlit í tey relevantu viðurskiftini gerst átrokandi samstundis sum tann reella dagsskráin verður ógreið.

Man saknar til dømis, serliga frá teirra síðu sum vilja reducera hetta málið til ein einfaldan spurning um almenna ogn, eina greiða viðurkenning av virðinum í teimum ‘track records’ og søguligu rættindum sum eru uppbygd av fiskivinnuni (hóast alt ov mong av teimum eru mist aftur við millumlanda samráðingarborð).

Eitt minstamark fyri rímiligheit í einum slíkum máli sum hesum má vera at man tekur atlit til substansin í tí, herundir ta søgu sum liggur aftanfyri. Tað var nevniliga ikki tað almenna sum bygdi upp fiskaríini, og fiskarí uppstanda heldur ikki av sær sjálvum — tey verða fyrst og fremst ment fram sum úrslit av innsatsi hjá teimum ið fiska og annars varða av fiskivinnuni.

Uppboð ella ikki, tilfeingisgjald ella ikki — fiskastovnar uttan fiskarí hava sum so einki vinnuligt virði, og tað er hóast alt fiskivinnan sum hevur staðið á odda fyri at byggja upp okkara fiskiríkidømi gjøgnum at fáa tað til høldar. Harvið ikki sagt at tænastur og alt annað uppi á landi ikki eisini er týdningarmikið í samanhanginum. Men uttan ein avgerandi innsats hjá fiskivinnuni høvdu vit neyvan havt nakran føroyskan tænastusektor ídag yvirhøvur; vit høvdu kanska framvegis verið eitt danskt amt við 5.000 íbúgvum.

Tað er tí óumhugsið (ella óerligt) at venda hesari søgu á høvdið og gera tað til at fiskiríkidømið verður latið fyri einki, uttan at vísa til hendan samanhangin. Tað at landið higartil ikki hevur tikið tilfeingisgjald fyri fiskirættindi er eitt annað mál, við ymiskum meiningum fyri og ímóti. Men tað mátti borið til, frá øllum síðum, at brúkt eitt orðalag sum er meira opið og grundleggjandi merkt av vælvild, heldur enn partapolitiskari spjaðing og fordómum.

Summi halda at tíðin er búgvin til at lata tað almenna taka okkurt slag av gjaldi fyri fiskirættindi, og eg trúgvi neyvan at tað er tað sum so ið fær ilt í fólk innan fiskivinnuna. Men eitt slíkt hugskot verður torført at gjøgnumføra uttan óhepnar fylgjur, um tað skal byggja á at embætisfólk diktera ein leist ígjøgnum, uttan yvirhøvur at fyrst samskifta væl og virðiliga við tey ið varða av fiskivinnuni soleiðis at man setir seg inn í allar spurningar og vísir hóskandi virðing, og fær fiskivinnuna sum viðspælara heldur enn mótstandara. Hetta átti at verið greitt fyri ein og hvønn ið brýggjar seg um at fáa tað besta at spyrjast burtur úr einari slíkari tilgongd, um hon nú er so alneyðug sum sagt verður.

Og eitt afturat. Tá tað verður kjakast um búskaparligt avkast frá einum givnum slag av virksemi (so sum fiskivinnu), so kann slíkt avkast í stuttum síggjast at hava tveir ymiskar týdningar: 1) fíggjarligt avlop av virkseminum fyri einstakar fyritøkur, og 2) tal á medborgarum ið liva av virkseminum. Harafturat kemur so beinleiðis og óbeinleiðis avleitt virksemi og skattainntøkur av ymiskum slag, men tað liggur á hesum sinni uttan fyri argumentið.

Mong tykjast tilvitað um tann fyrra týdningin og vilja gjarna undirstrika ymiskar síður av honum, men tað øvugta tykist galda fyri tann seinna. Eg haldi hetta er eitt sindur løgið tá hugsað verður um at menniskjan er ein skapningur sum er genetiskt forritaður til at hoyra til í socialum høpi. Hartil kemur at vit liva í einum fíggjarliga og búskaparliga sera ótryggum tíðarskeiði.

Her kann man skjóta inn, eins og íslendingar hava sannað síðani skrædlið har, at fiskurin er ein sera sterkur valuti at eiga atgongd til!

Og her endi eg so aftur í einum tema um virðiligt samskifti sum treyt fyri at røkka góðum úrslitum. Vit kunnu nevniliga hvørki síggja burtur frá tí samfelagsliga ella tí søguliga, heldur ikki tá tað snýr seg um fiskivinnu.

Alt at vinna við at samskifta virðiliga

Ein stutt viðmerking til Fiskivinnutingið tann 22. mars.

Eg fekk tíverri alt ov lítið við av Fiskivinnutinginum týsdagin 22. mars, men tað eg hoyrdi av orðaskiftinum móti endanum fekk meg at hugsa eitt sindur, og tískil hesar fáu reglur.

Tað sigst at lykilin til framgongd á øllum økjum fyri eina familju ella eitt samfelag er samanhald millum fólkið, sínámillum virðing og grundleggjandi vælvild. Og at, hinvegin, spjaðing, klandur og stríð hevur ómetaligar kostnaðir við sær av alskyns slag — burturspilt orka, mist tíð, peningaligur missur og annað, fyri ikki at tala um óneyðugt stress og versnaða heilsu fyri mong.

Um munurin millum hesar báðar mótpólar í grundini er óendaligur, átti lítil ivi at verið um hvat ið er best fyri eitt lítið samfelag sum Føroyar. So hví keglast vit so í heilum um líkt og ólíkt, ístaðin fyri at finna gott felags stev?

Uttan mun til at okkara áhugamál kunnu vera ymisk, vildi eg hildið at tað er avgerandi at vit læra okkum at draga somu línu í stórum málum. Um ikki annað, so mugu vit kunna vísa við okkara samskifti at vit virða tilveruna hjá hvørjum øðrum.

Í tann mun vit ikki kunnu semjast um bestu leið at ganga — tað veri seg innan útbúgving, mentan, vinnu, búskap, ella annað — skylda vit tó hvørjum øðrum eina viðurkenning av at alt sum eitur politikkur og samfelagslig menning snýr seg fyrst og fremst um menniskju: alt vit gera hevur avleiðingar upp á gott og ónt fyri menniskjaligar umstøður, livikor hjá fólki, og viðurskifti millum persónar.

Tey ið vilja fremja umfatandi broytingar t.d. á fiskivinnu økinum, uttan mun til hvussu væl skikkað tey meta seg vera til at vísa vegin og taka avgerðir fyri onnur, hava tí eina moralska skyldu til at tosa við tey sum verða beinleiðis rakt í sínum gerandisdegi av slíkum broytingum. Tey hava ikki bara eina skyldu til at virða teirra vitan og umhugsa týdningin av teirra arbeiði — tey hava alt at vinna við at gera so. Avgerðir sum verða tiknar uttan eitt sterkt grundarlag enda ofta við at koma afturum aftur.

Út frá einum samskiftis sjónarmiði er tað burturvið at viðgera inntriv sum kunnu fáa stórar avleiðingar fyri onnur uttan hóskandi hoyringar og grundigar forkanningar, hetta bæði fyri at tryggja nøktandi grundvitan til at byggja avgerðir á, og fyri at vísa virðing fyri teimum sum kunnu fáa óhepnar fylgjur í sín part. Alt annað er órímiligt og vil fáa ringar avleiðingar. Neyvan nakað man í longdini vera meira skaðiligt fyri eitt samfelag enn tann harmur og tann illvild sum stendst av at fólk ikki verða vird, fáa sínar royndir, sítt innlit, og sítt stríð og strev gjørt til einkis, ella upp á aðrar mátar verða viðfarin órættvíst.

Hetta er ikki bara heilt grundleggjandi fyri gott samskifti men eisini fyri stabilitetin í einum fólkaræði. Tað snýr seg hóast alt um nakað so týdningarmikið sum álit, trúvirði, og etisk virðir, og harvið óbeinleiðis um alt annað eisini, íroknað samfelagsbúskap.

Mong eru samd um at okkurt má gerast fyri at vinna betri viðurkenning fyri føroyskar fiskavørur og føroyska fiskiveiði. Men júst hvørjar broytingar eru neyðugar og ynskiligar? Hvussu tryggja vit at fleiri føroysk fiskarí kunnu vinna MSC (ella møguliga aðra) ecolabel góðkenning? Verður nóg nógv gjørt fyri at dokumentera yvir fyri útlendingum hvussu okkara fiskivinna er skipað? Kunnu vit finna betri mátar til at áseta talið á fiskidøgum uttan at fáa órógvandi alment kjak á hvørjum ári? Hvat er komið burtur úr skipanini við “fyribils stongdum leiðum” og hvussu leingi skulu hesar leiðir vera stongdar? Hvussu skulu fiskiloyvir handfarast í framtíðini?

Fyri at tryggja eina trúverda tilgongd í slíkum spurningum ræður tað fyrst og fremst um at samskifta virðiliga; síðani at viðgera sakliga hvat enn ið kemur á dagsskrá, og hareftir taka sunnar og rættar avgerðir sum so kunnu gjøgnumførast. Ikki umvent, at fyrst taka avgerð og so royna sum best at gjøgnumføra uttan veruligt grundarlag.

Tað finnist góður lesnaður um ítøkiligar mannagongdir v.m. tá talan er um konsultatión sum amboð fyri avgerðatøku í bólkum. Og tað er púra greitt at óneyðug og undirgravandi polarisering kann, við rættari kunning og røttum hugburði, vendast til dynamiska styrki.

Eg haldi ikki vit kunnu brúka sum standard umbering at øll hini eru treisk, hopleys, ella ómøgulig at samskifta við!

At enda vil eg ynskja politiskum myndugleika, vinnu, vísindafólkum, og øllum pørtum góðan arbeiðshug og góða eydnu.